Page 1 of 1

Voting for least progress on a project since records began

Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2017 11:26 pm
by AMCQ46
only 1 choice on this one and voting closes at midnight on 1st

Re: Voting for least progress on a project since records began

Posted: Wed Dec 27, 2017 9:18 am
by Pete.L
Bazza's Invisible Storm :clap: Its been going on for so long I'd forgotten all about that. I thought it was just a myth to be talked about at bike meets :lol:

Re: Voting for least progress on a project since records began

Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2017 7:15 pm
by Flatline
Oh for heavens sake, it's only 5 years..............Nuclear power stations take about 10 years :lol:

Re: Voting for least progress on a project since records began

Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2017 8:25 pm
by MacV2
Flatline wrote: Thu Dec 28, 2017 7:15 pm Oh for heavens sake, it's only 5 years..............Nuclear power stations take about 10 years :lol:
Ahmmm. The date on this... viewtopic.php?f=30&t=21082&hilit=ducafe#p170744 ...says Tue Sep 13, 2011 7:53 pm

That 6 years, 3 months, 15 days 31mins... That poor time keeping may have something to do with the late running... :lol:

Re: Voting for least progress on a project since records began

Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2017 9:04 pm
by fabiostar
MacV2 wrote: Thu Dec 28, 2017 8:25 pm
Flatline wrote: Thu Dec 28, 2017 7:15 pm Oh for heavens sake, it's only 5 years..............Nuclear power stations take about 10 years :lol:
Ahmmm. The date on this... viewtopic.php?f=30&t=21082&hilit=ducafe#p170744 ...says Tue Sep 13, 2011 7:53 pm

That 6 years, 3 months, 15 days 31mins... That poor time keeping may have something to do with the late running... :lol:
is it true the Titanic was designed,build and sunk in half the time????